Halloween treat: every premium lesson is free right now. No login, no paywall.
MBAbullshit

Stock Valuation Exam Training

Exam questions on stock valuation rarely stop at one formula. A common twist is nonconstant growth: dividends grow fast for a few years, then settle into steady growth. You discount the early dividends one by one, use the Gordon model for the rest, and add it all up.

Deep dive · was premium20:48

Nonconstant growth stock valuation, explained simply

For a stock with nonconstant growth, discount each fast-growth dividend separately, use the Gordon model to price the stock at the point where growth becomes steady, then discount that price back too. In the example, the stock is worth about $19.44.

What this stock valuation exam lesson covers

  • How to spot which stock valuation model a question needs
  • How to value a stock with nonconstant (supernormal) growth
  • Where to place the Gordon growth price on the timeline
  • Common exam traps: D₀ versus D₁, and discounting the wrong year

Nonconstant growth formulas, explained

Nonconstant growth stock
P₀ = D₁ ÷ (1 + r) + ... + D_N ÷ (1 + r)ᴺ + P_N ÷ (1 + r)ᴺ
D₁ to D_N
Dividends during the high-growth years
P_N
Price at year N, when constant growth begins
r
Required return
Price at the start of constant growth
P_N = D_(N+1) ÷ (r − g)
D_(N+1)
First dividend of the constant-growth phase
g
Long-run constant growth rate

How to solve a nonconstant growth problem step by step (worked example)

A firm just paid a $1.00 dividend. Dividends will grow 20% a year for two years, then 5% a year forever. The required return is 12%. What is the stock worth today?

  1. D₁ = 1.00 × 1.20 = 1.20; D₂ = 1.20 × 1.20 = 1.44
  2. D₃ = 1.44 × 1.05 = 1.512
  3. P₂ = 1.512 ÷ (0.12 − 0.05) = 21.60
  4. P₀ = 1.20 ÷ 1.12 + (1.44 + 21.60) ÷ 1.12² ≈ 1.0714 + 18.3673
  5. P₀ ≈ 19.44

Answer: The stock is worth about $19.44 (rounded to the nearest cent).

Common stock valuation exam traps

TrapWhat goes wrongFix
D₀ vs D₁Using the dividend just paid in the Gordon formulaGrow it one year first: D₁ = D₀ × (1 + g)
Wrong year for P_NDiscounting the Gordon price from year N + 1P_N sits at year N; discount it N years
Growth at or above rThe Gordon formula gives nonsenseOnly use it once growth is below the required return
Forgetting the last dividendLeaving out D_N in year NAdd D_N and P_N together in year N

Harder nonconstant growth questions

What if the 20% growth lasted three years instead of two?

D₁ = 1.20, D₂ = 1.44, D₃ = 1.728, then P₃ = 1.728 × 1.05 ÷ 0.07 = 25.92. Discounting it all at 12% gives about $21.90.

How much of the $19.44 comes from the price at Year 2?

P₂ of $21.60 is worth 21.60 ÷ 1.12² ≈ $17.22 today, about 88.6% of the total. Most of a growth stock's value sits in the years after the forecast.

Common stock valuation exam questions

How do you value a stock with nonconstant growth?

Write out each dividend during the fast-growth years. At the year when steady growth starts, use the Gordon model to find the price at that point. Then discount every early dividend and that future price back to today and add them up.

Why is the Gordon growth price discounted from year N and not year N + 1?

The Gordon formula P_N = D_(N+1) ÷ (r − g) gives a price one year before the dividend it uses. So a price built from D₃ is a Year 2 value and you discount it for two years. This is the single most common error on these problems.

How do I find the required return on a stock for an exam?

If the question gives price, next dividend and growth, use r = D₁ ÷ P₀ + g. If it gives a beta, a risk-free rate and a market return, use CAPM instead. Read the question for which pieces of data you actually have.

What is the best way to practice stock valuation problems?

Draw a timeline for every question, mark each dividend in the year it is paid, and label where any terminal price sits. Then solve problems of each type: zero growth, constant growth, nonconstant growth and solving for r, until the setup becomes automatic.